When we err in an arithmetic operation for example, do not blame the tables, but to human error, and in that case is reviewed to detect the fault. It is imposed upon an anthropology because we must preserve human dignity and social status of animal. But the natural man ideal, although it is linked to the coexistence and culture, or given in society, or live among us. Read more here: Ted Lasso. There is no perfect citizen. But let’s see if there are natural rights.
The first impression is obvious: the natural attributes of man, captured by common sense give way to a fee regardless of any social convention or standard. Therefore, for any interpreter act as bedrock principles. Remember as an example, article 1 of our Constitution: Spain becomes a social and democratic state of law, which holds as superior values of its legal freedom, justice, equality and political pluralism. The law is as a human endeavor made by and for men, with all its misery and grandeur, that, behind three ideas: first that the right applies in daily life, needs his Jiminy Cricket, ie monitoring which makes it a natural right, and that tells the legislature to hear things like that rich and poor are equal, or that we have the same rights as men and women. The second, that his utility, such as Andres Ollero says, is that it is unscientific, because then it would be unenforceable.
Imagine if in a dispute between neighbors, for example, had to do before deciding the case, a scientific prediction based on the sociology of human behavior. The third, the need for a State as an organization and power of execution because duties be imposed. And in the end, we have to ask the question “What is justice?, It may have been the most passion that has arisen in the history of thought, and possibly lack of response. My final thought would be that the right whose protection is that science can flourish, and along with science, truth and progress. Like any human endeavor, is subject to error, but if I questioned his lack of discretion, defend to the death the system but sometimes common sense does not allow us to understand certain judicial decisions. In a country like Spain, with great distrust of the courts and apprehensive our legal profession should be stressed that without these professionals, balancing the desire that any kind of totalizing power want for themselves, our freedoms would be threatened. Without the inspectors of the rules of the game, the triumph of Orwellian society would be absolute.
